The most salient part of the article for Dr. Limerick seems to be this paragraph, which I think is also my favorite, just because it is such a black-and-white example of the book's distortion of the truth:
Here's another great example of how she [Ann Coulter] twists the facts. I don't have the page right in front of me, but in her attempt to portray the New York Times as left-wing, she says that because they have been endorsing Democrats, it's been more than a quarter of a century since the New York Times endorsed a presidential candidate who has won a majority of the popular vote. Now, I'll take Coulter's word that that's true. But, of course, it's been more than 13 of those 25 years, since any presidential candidate won a majority of the popular vote, and in every one of those presidential elections, The New York Times endorsed the candidate who got the largest percentage of the popular vote. This is The Official Record.
2:23 AM
link to this item:
http://www.creamy.com/blog/2002/09/my-review-of-slander.html