You want to know what my biggest problem is with the Bush administration is? It's how no matter whatever the situation is, they'll twist it around so that it is some kind of "proof" that they are right. It's so transparently dishonest and self-serving that I feel very insulted each time that they think I'm going to fall for it.
For example, when George W. Bush took over the country, we had a budget surplus. So the Bush administration said that this surplus was proof that we needed to implement their tax plan, which would lower taxes on the wealthy. But when Bush talked down the economy and the surplus disappeared, the Bush administration said that this showed that we need to stimulate the economy-- by implementing their tax plan, which would lower taxes on the wealthy.
When Bush wanted to invade Iraq, he gave all his "proof" that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. But when UN inspectors failed to find any "smoking gun" evidence of such weapons, Press Secretary Ari Fleischer repeatedly said smugly that the problem with guns that are hidden is that you can't see the smoke, suggesting that the lack of evidence of WMD, was proof that the Iraqis were hiding them.
There are countless examples of this sort of doublespeak that makes listening to the Bush administration feel like talking to a wall. But the latest one takes the cake.
Here's the heart of it: "'The more successful we are on the ground, the more these killers will react,' Bush said as he sat in the Oval Office with L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. administrator in Iraq. He added: 'The more progress we make on the ground, the more free the Iraqis become, the more electricity is available, the more jobs are available, the more kids that are going to school, the more desperate these killers become, because they can't stand the thought of a free society.'"
This is the same Bush administration that assured us before the war that the Iraqi people would throw down their weapons and greet us with open arms. And now they expect you to buy this?
This hardly needs to be said, but I'm going to say it. In basically all wars, the other side fights back, and this is not an indication of the success of the attackers. Does the American Revolution vindicate the British? Does the Union victory in the Civil War vindicate the Confederate attack on Fort Sumter? According to Bush, an attack is not only justified when the other side welcomes you as a liberator, but also when they resist you. By this logic, all military attacks are always justified.
Thursday, Joclyn G. and I went to Restaurant Row for Italian Food, after I decided to go off the Atkins Diet after two and a half weeks. That always seems to be my limit before I get too crazy.
This movie starts out with a promising premise, of a wealthy French estate owner in Morocco , who falls for one of the women who work in his garden. She is beautiful, already involved with someone, and feels nothing for this man whom she finds to be very unattractive and who is married and who doesn't speak the same language as she does. But the disparity between his fabulous wealth and her abject poverty places tremendous pressure on her to consider the relationship. But the movie rambles along very slowly and ultimately goes nowhere. There are some clever lines, here and there, but not nearly enough to carry the movie. The movie is in French and Arabic with English subtitles for both. This is The Official Record.
1:23 PM
link to this item:
http://www.creamy.com/blog/2003/10/movie-review-raja-2003-1-star-out-of-4.html
I was reluctant to give out 4 stars to a book twice in two months, when I think it should be given out only once or twice a year, but I couldn't withhold it from this amazing book.
It captures the tension between the need to give each patient the best possible care, and the need to train inexperienced doctors on real patients. It carefully examines other sources of error, and what can be done about them. It's a brilliant page-turner that is almost impossible to put down. This is The Official Record.
4:22 PM
link to this item:
http://www.creamy.com/blog/2003/10/book-review-complications-2003-4-stars.html
O'Reilly's first two books were okay, but his "success" (his show reaches only a tiny fraction of the viewership of the network news and magazine shows) has convinced him that he speaks for all Americans. Anyone who refuses an invitation to appear on his right-wing show is "refusing to account to the American people." Does he really not understand that there are reasons not to come on a show hosted by an arrogant jerk who interrupts his guests and makes up facts, other than not wanting to account to the American people? Does he really believe his own lies? Over and over, for example, he falsely accuses Clinton of refusing ever to explain his reasons for the Mark Rich pardon, even though Clinton wrote an extensive op-ed piece in the New York Times about it, which, in turn, received tremendous national attention. But unless you do it on "The Factor" you're dodging the American people.
Aside from this annoying tendency, his "insights" are not so much "common sense" as "common knowledge"-- at least when he's not just making things up. One of the more dreadful bits of advice he dispenses is very early in the book: if you are a good person you don't have to worry about who you associate with, because bad people won't want to hang out with you. So, for example, he says that if you don't drink, drunkards won't want your tee-totaling company, and if you don't do crystal meth, people who do won't enjoy your presence at their parties. In the first place, in my experience, if you ever go to a bar and drink sodas all night, when you go home, everyone will ask you the same thing: "Are you sure you're okay to drive?" That's because drunks are not very observant about what other people are drinking. Try it-- it's really uncanny. Second, and more importantly, bad people need good people to be with so they can take advantage of them. For example, by conning them. Or stealing from them. Or raping them. Just tell your pretty 16 year-old daughter not to worry about the fact that she's hanging around with crack addicts, because they won't want her around if she doesn't smoke crack. Thanks for the swell advice, Bill!
Finally, he stubbornly clings to the many lies he's told over the years that have already been repeatedly exposed. He insists that he grew up in the blue-color city of Levittown, even thought he actually grew up in the affluent neighborhood of Westbury. He insists that he's a political independent, even though he has registered to vote as a Republican. This, even as he rips into Bill Clinton over and over, almost three years after Clinton left office, while continuing to heap praise on the Bush administration.
I'll be honest-- I just could not follow the plot of this movie. Maybe that's because I'm stupid, but I think it's because this movie made no sense. It had little else to offer-- the dialogue was either uninteresting or lost something in translation (the movie is mostly in French, with English subtitles), the action scenes were unoriginal, and the sex scenes were extremely creepy. This is The Official Record.
11:01 AM
link to this item:
http://www.creamy.com/blog/2003/10/movie-review-demonlover-2002-12-half.html
Sunday, I want and took a look at a building I'm contemplating buying on the Lower East Side, and I had brunch in the East Village. Sunday night, I saw Demonlover with Andy M. and Sophie W., which was awful. Then we had dinner on Curry Row (sixth street between 1st and 2nd Avenues) at one of the dozen or so Indian Restaurants there. This is The Official Record.
10:57 AM
link to this item:
http://www.creamy.com/blog/2003/10/last-weekend_14.html
I was hoping the California recall would fail, and I was hoping that, if it didn't, then Lt. Gov Cruz Bustamante would win. But since that didn't happen, I am glad that Arnold Schwarzenegger won with more votes than Davis received in his 2002 election. It would have been a terrible perversion of democracy if a candidate had won with, say, ten percent of the vote. I hope that California modifies this system so that recalls are not as easy to initiate, and so that it's harder to get on the ballot, or so that there is a run-off election, or something like that.
I've been watching the news all day, and I keep hearing that when you combine the votes for Schwarzenegger and McClintock, together that is a solid majority voting for a Republican candidate, and a mandate for a conservative, Republican gubernatorial administration.
Well, that's all fine, but then, of course, we should also combine Al Gore's and Ralph Nader's votes in the 2000 Presidential election giving a solid majority vote for a liberal Presidential administration.
See, e.g.,
Fox News Channel: "A big majority for the two Republicans combined."
The Weekly standard: "And when you combine Schwarzenegger's vote with Tom McClintock's (13.3), it adds up to a Republican landslide"
Opinion Journal from The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page: "If Messrs. Schwarzenegger and McClintock combined capture more than 50% of the vote, than [sic] even the liberal Democrats who control the state Legislature will likely be spooked into allowing some conservative reforms through." (Published before the election).
1. If you were to go on a diet (not that you should, babe, you look marvelous), which of the "fad diets" sounds the most appealing to you? I go on the Atkins diet every now and then, and I'm on it now. I have been for about a week. It's the first time I've done it since February.
2. I only ask, because with the holidays coming up, there will be a lot more food in our house than usual. It tempts me. Maybe if I exercise I can loose some now, and eat then and have it all balance out. Do you get much exercise? I try to use the elliptical machine every day.
3. When I was walking the other night, I noticed a rent house was being cleaned out by the landlord. Apparently the owners just took the essentials and left a lot of junk in the house. The owner had stacked piles of junk on the lawn for the sanitation collectors. But I noticed several things in that mess that maybe I could use (like a gas powered hedge trimmer). I may still go back some dark evening. Have you ever raided someone's junk pile that was left out for the garbage truck? Or gone dumpster diving? What did you find? I saw a stack of videotapes on the street is SoHo. I never did watch them all, but the ones I saw were really boring.
4. Also in that same dumpster was the most awful shade of bright green carpet you've ever seen. Seriously, you wouldn't believe it if I showed you (and I will try to get a photo). Do you have any memories of ugly carpeting in your home or someone else's? Not so much. But I do have a CD rack I got from Ikea, specifically because it was the most horrible, offensive shade of green I'd ever seen, and I just had to own it.
5. As summer draws to a close, it means fewer outside chores. One I won't miss at all is mowing the lawn! What summertime chores will you be glad to see go away for the winter months? I live in a box 250 feet up in the sky, so I don't really have summertime chores. But the truth is, I'm much more apt to go outside in the winter than the summer, because I hate hot weather. That, more than anything else, is why I moved from Florida to the northeast. I would take 20 degrees over 90 degrees any day.
6. Of course, it is hard to mention fall without at least touching on football. Do you have a(ny) favorite football team(s)? Do you and your family root for the same teams to win? I am not a sports fan. I guess if I could pick a team to win the Superbowl, I'd pick the Miami Dolphins, since that's what my family roots for.
7. I will be heading to Anaheim next month to stay a few days for a convention. It would be great to meet up with some Bloggers, but I just don't know many out there. If you were to visit California, are there any Bloggers you'd like to meet up with? (And if you are in California, then who would you like to come see you!) The two people who introduced me to blogging are two of my best friends: Sean S. and Dav C.
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:52:40 -0400 From: Jonathan G. Kowalski Subject: Wizard Of Oz - In New York
please forward to prospective participants
"Wizard of OZ" Global Flash - Event Description
A flash mob where everyone enters different coffee houses around the nation in a Conga line chanting ding dong the wicked witch is dead for three minutes then disperse!
"Wizard of OZ" Global Flash - New York City Location Info
October 11th, 3pm @ Starbucks at 13-25 Astor Place, East Village. Close to the #6 Train.
The Beer social after the Mobbing of Oz will be at Swift's Pub at 34 East 4th Street.
All will wear red as our identity as intended. Participants are encouraged to bring Munchkin friendship tokens in the form of Smileys and hearts.
Meet the woman with long reddish hair and wearing a black newsboy cap at 2:45 standing across the street from the Starbucks, by the big black cube.
The people who are participating should approach her with the password, "Follow the yellow brick road."
"Wizard of OZ" Global Flash - New York City WebLink
The very first regular feature on my blog was a summary of what I'd done the last weekend. But lately, as more people I don't know personally have been reading my blog, I've been less inclined to post personal stuff, I think. But I want to get back to that, because I really liked letting the people I care about know the details of what's going on with me that I might not think to tell them in person, and because I liked having a record of what I'd been doing. Accordingly:
Friday night, I finally tried the new Red Lobster restaurant in Times Square with Jin K. There was a terrible wait that was considerably longer than they said it would be, and then the service was awful. But the food was great. Then we saw School of Rock, which I reviewed.
Saturday, Jessica D. and I went to see Deep Dish Cabaret, an alternative stand-up comedy show. It was really interesting and often very funny, and I recommend it very highly.
It's hard for liberals and Democrats not to gloat about the fact that no evidence of any weapons of mass destruction (WMD) has been found in Iraq. But it's also hard for any American not to hope that WMD will be found, since it will greatly enhance American credibility in the world. For example, even Al Franken, in his new book, says that he hopes WMD will be found in Iraq, in order to increase America's standing in the world.
I don't disagree with that, but I also have a very different take on it. Thank God that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Thank goodness that thousands or tens of thousands of American soldiers were not exposed to nerve gas or anthrax or nuclear explosions. I feel bad about this terrible mistake, but what a miracle that Iraq turned out not to have any WMD to use against Americans in the 2003 war on Iraq. There are things a lot more important than being right. This is The Official Record.
6:31 PM
link to this item:
http://www.creamy.com/blog/2003/10/weapons-of-mass-distortion.html
A new New York Times / CBS poll finds that Americans think the War on Iraq was a mistake by a ratio of 53 to 41, with 6 percent undecided. The New York Times buries this in the 13th paragraph of their story about the poll. And here's what they say about it, which I find misleading:
"Now there are growing doubts about whether the results were worth the loss of life and other costs involved. Only 41 percent said it was, while 53 percent said it was not. When the question was asked using Saddam Hussein's name, the results were almost reversed, with about half those surveyed le saying it was worth removing him from power, and 41 percent saying it was not."
But here are the two questions they ask, which do more than just put Saddam's name in the question:
Half the people were asked, "Do you think removing Saddam Hussein from power is worth the potential loss of American life and the other costs of attacking Iraq, or not?" to which 51% said yes, 41% said no, and 8% were undecided.
The other half of the people were asked, "Do you think the result of the war with Iraq was worth the loss of American life and other costs of attacking Iraq or not?" to which 41% said yes, 53% said no, and 6% were undecided.
In other words, only a bare majority of Americans think that removing Saddam Hussein from power is worth the POTENTIAL (as opposed to past) loss of life that may result from that. But a majority greater than the margin of error of the poll say that, "the result of the Iraq war" wasn't worth it. But the result of the Iraq war includes a lot of things besides the removal of Saddam from power. It includes hundreds of dead Americans, the serious weakening of American foreign relations, a serious quagmire with no exit strategy for our troops, and a Saddam Hussein still at large with a billion dollars and a serious grudge against America.
In other words, the first question can reasonably be interpreted as, "Would it be worth the cost and lives to remove Saddam Hussein, if it could be done without creating other serious problems." But the second question can only be interpreted as "What do you think of the job we actually did in removing Saddam Hussein from power?" That is, main difference between the two questions is not that one names Saddam and one does not. The difference is that one names the disastrous Iraq war, and one does not.
Here's another incredible finding, I think:
Do you think the war in Iraq is still going on or is the war over? 87% say it's still going on. 10% say it's Over. 1% volunteer that it "depends". And 2% don't know or don't answer. So much for the campaign commercial featuring bush in his flight suit. This is The Official Record.
6:39 PM
link to this item:
http://www.creamy.com/blog/2003/10/was-war-on-iraq-worth-it-america-says.html
This was a really funny movie, with a star-making performance by Jack Black. It is most remarkable in that it is simultaneously a very dark comedy that will tickle sophisticated adults, yet it's also a very family-friendly movie suitable for young children. My only complaint is that it's a little formulaic, and yet there are a couple of loose ends left over at the end. But it's really funny and definitely worth seeing. This is The Official Record.
6:17 PM
link to this item:
http://www.creamy.com/blog/2003/10/movie-review-school-of-rock-2003-12-3.html