Subscribe here: RSS Feed
The Official Record 
FAIR AND BALANCED™
  corner   



HOME

ARCHIVES


Put general comments about this blog here:
Click to leave your thoughts.















A blog by someone who doesn't like or understand blogs.














A major theme of this blog is the love affair between the blogger and the city of New York.














Email me at david [at] danzig [dot] com.














Bloggers with whom I am personally acquainted, in real life, in alphebetical order by first name:

Caren L.
Dav C.
David D.
Eva J.
Jessica D.
Joclyn G.
Lauren P.
Sean S.
Steph T.
david danzig
david danzig If you know me in person, and I forgot to put you here, definitely, please email me, and also please accept my apology!














Take a look at some of my nearby neighbors by clicking this button: .

 

Sunday, February 29, 2004

 
JUST WHAT KIND OF AN IDIOT ARE YOU?
External link: http://quizilla.com/users/official/quizzes/Just%20what%20kind%20of%20an%20idiot%20are%20you%3F

Just what kind of an idiot are you? Take this simple quiz and find out.

I wrote it myself, at quizilla.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/just-what-kind-of-idiot-are-you.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107809514444097691

 
STILL TOO CLOSE TO CALL.
External link: http://douweosinga.com/projects/thenextpresident/

Here's how I score the next election right now, off the top of my head. Since I haven't looked at polls in every state, this is sure to be highly inaccurate, so I'd appreciate any suggestions anybody has.



John F. Kerry (blue) wins 223 votes in AZ, CA, CO, DC, DE, HI, IL, ME, MD, MA, MI, NJ, NM, NY, VT, WA, and WI
George W. Bush (orange) wins 137 votes in AL, AK, GA, LA, MS, NV, NH, NC, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV.
The green states, totaling 178 votes, are too close (or I'm too ignorant) for me to call them: AR, CT, FL, ID, IN, IA, KS, KY, MN, MO, MT, NE, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SD, UT, WY.

Obviously, in addition to any mistakes I've already made, it's also true that much will probably change between now and November.

To make your own electoral map, go here.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/still-too-close-to-call.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107807495409833657

 
WHICH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ARE YOU?
External link: http://quizilla.com/users/WrenchofDelivery/quizzes/Which%20Federal%20Rule%20of%20Civil%20Procedure%20Are%20You%3F/

My Results actually sound about right:

"YOU ARE RULE 11! You were designed to make sure that attorneys in federal cases make reasonable inquiries into fact or law before submitting pleadings, motions, or other papers. You were a real hardass in 1983, when you snuffed out all legal creativity from federal proceedings and embarassed well-meaning but overzealous attorneys. You loosened up a bit in 1993, when you began allowing plaintiffs to make allegations in their complaints that are likely to have evidenciary support after discovery, and when you allowed a 21 day period for the erring attorney to withdraw the errant motion. Sure, you keep everything running on the up and up, but it's clear that things would be a lot more fun without you around."

Take the quiz!


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/which-federal-rule-of-civil-procedure.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107807487119353468



Friday, February 27, 2004

 
VERY CROSS AT THE INTERSECTION.
External link: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/27/nyregion/27BUTT.html?th

The New York Times today reports that, In New York City, almost all of those buttons with signs telling pedestrians to press them for a walk signal aren't hooked up to anything, and haven't been since the late 1980s. Those intersections are now controlled by computers. However, a relatively small number, about 750 of them, do still work, and you will never see a walk sign, until a pedestrian presses the button or a car comes to the intersection.

The article explains that "At $300 or $400 per intersection, it would cost about $1 million to remove the disconnected mechanisms," and that there's always a more pressing need for that money.

But how much would it cost to leave the buttons and just take down the "To Cross Street Push Button" signs or just paint over the signs or even just slap a "disconnected" sticker on the signs at those intersections where the buttons are disconnected? I'm going to guess that would cost much, much less, perhaps no more than a few dollars per intersection. If that's still too much money, then why not sell the signs to advertisers, and let them cover the costs of repainting? Remember, the intersections where the buttons were disconnected, are those where there was too much foot traffic for the button to handle, so they'd be quite attractive to advertisers, who'd have a truly captive audience and no other ads around to compete with. I'm not normally in favor of increasing the amount of advertising I'm exposed to, but this is one rare case where it would be better than the alternative.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/very-cross-at-intersection.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107790130789310398



Thursday, February 26, 2004

 
I'M BACK.
External link:

I went to South Florida for the weekend, to plan and execute my brother's bachelor party, which was last Saturday. He's getting married in two weeks.

I also got to see my father on his birthday, which was on the 24th. For his birthday, I got him a set of 500 casino-quality poker chips.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/im-back.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107777743132195892



Monday, February 16, 2004

 
TEASER.
External link: http://lunaville.org/warcasualties/Summary.aspx

Here's a quick excerpt from my previous, longish blog entry to whet your appetite.

"George W. Bush is saying that even though he used political influence to join the National Guard in order to avoid serving in Vietnam, back when 99.96% of the National Guard did not have to participate in combat, we should not criticize him for doing that, because NOW, scores of National Guardsmen are being killed in Iraq, because HE, GEORGE W. BUSH, sent them there to die. It's like if George W. Bush was hiding in bunker while people were outside fighting for the country, and then he murdered all the other people who were hiding in the bunker with him, and then he said that we shouldn't criticize him for hiding in a bunker, since hiding in a bunker is so dangerous, as evidenced by the fact that all the other people in the bunker with him got murdered. . . . It's just like the parable of the boy who murders his parents, and then pleads for sympathy because he is an orphan!"

Now, please read the whole article if you haven't already.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/teaser.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107698490035012015

 
GEORGE W. BUSH THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS.
External link: http://lunaville.org/warcasualties/Summary.aspx

I don't think I'm the smartest guy in the world, but there's a lot of stuff about this war in Iraq that is absolutely through the looking glass, and nobody's talking about it, and I don't get it.

First, people ARE talking about the fact that we were told that we had to risk American lives, and kill thousands of Iraqis in order to protect ourselves from Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD). But everyone keeps saying that it's a bad thing that we didn't find any WMD. Well, I say, thank god there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Even without any, we're looking at, as I write this, 643 dead Americans, and 3,040 seriously wounded (e.g., missing arms and legs). As bad as that number is, it would have been a whole lot higher if Iraq had had the sort of arsenal of WMD that president Bush said they did. What if he really did have chemical weapons and buckets of anthrax? How many Americans would be dead then? Instead of asking why we picked a fight with a defenseless foe, we'd be asking why we picked a fight with such a well-defended foe. Iraq isn't another Vietnam, but if Iraq were as well-armed as we thought they were, then it might have been.

But, since there apparently are no WMD to be found in Iraq, we have now been told that the real reason we went was to install democracy in Iraq. Now, suppose Bush had said at the outset that this country is defenseless and harmless, but we prefer to change their form of government to a different one, so we're going to send over a hundred thousand Americans over there, hundreds of them will be killed, thousands more will be injured, and tens of thousands of Iraqis will be killed, including thousands of civilians, and all this at a cost of a hundred billion dollars to US taxpayers. Would we have gone for that? Would that have happened? There was a case to be made for it, but I don't think it would have been popular.

But even granting that our reason for going over there was, all along, to instill democracy, then why won't the US let them vote? The US unilaterally appointed a governing counsel to unilaterally write their Constitution, and now the Bush administration is insisting on so-called "caucuses" instead of direct elections, arguing, among other things, that Iraq is "not ready" for democracy, and there couldn't be a direct election, anyway, since no one has taken a census yet. And you know what? The Bush administration is a hundred percent right! We can't possibly let the Iraqis vote for whoever they want, because if we did, then they'd all vote for people who would do everything possible to destroy America, because that's what the Iraqi people want. So, I definitely support the Bush administrations decision NOT to allow democratic elections in Iraq. But, then, what are we doing there?

But here's the REALLY crazy part. Bush is on the defensive right now about his service in the National Guard, and how that contrasts with Kerry's service in Vietnam. And he keeps saying that it's wrong for people to criticize his National Guard service, because there are people in that same National Guard who are fighting right now in Iraq. Am I the only person in the world who understands the words coming out of Bush's mouth? George W. Bush is saying that even though he used political influence to join the National Guard in order to avoid serving in Vietnam, back when 99.96% of the National Guard did not have to participate in combat, we should not criticize him for doing that, because NOW, scores of National Guardsmen are being killed in Iraq, because HE, GEORGE W. BUSH, sent them there to die. It's like if George W. Bush was hiding in bunker while people were outside fighting for the country, and then he murdered all the other people who were hiding in the bunker with him, and then he said that we shouldn't criticize him for hiding in a bunker, since hiding in a bunker is so dangerous, as evidenced by the fact that all the other people in the bunker with him got murdered. That is exactly analogous to what Bush is saying, and it is completely topsy turvy. It's just like the parable of the boy who murders his parents, and then pleads for sympathy because he is an orphan!

And in the end, it doesn't really matter whether he showed up to his National Guard duty nor not or whether he lied about it. The important thing is that he used his political connections to get into the National Guard to avoid the draft, so that someone else could be sent to fight, and perhaps to die, in his place. And the only reason that matters is that I honestly do not believe that Bush would have been so quick to send so many people to war, if he had ever experienced it for himself.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/george-w-bush-through-looking-glass.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107698471669249970

 
LAST WEEKEND.
External link: http://www.carnivalknowledge.com/

Thursday, I went to Wetbar with Steve K., his brother Charles K., Heidi F., Maria, Addi, and some other people I met that night. Then we went to Umberto's Clam House in Little Italy for a late night snack.

Friday, I saw 50 First Dates with Andy M. and Sophie W., and then had dinner at Dallas BBQ.

Saturday, I saw Carnival Knowledge with Caroline M. and had dinner in Chinatown.

Sunday, I went shopping for electronics and comic books and played a lot of online poker. I won three heads-up tournaments in a row, and I was going to quit, but poker legend Doyle Brunson insists that sometimes you get a "rush" where you win a bunch in a row, and you should always play again after you win. I'm not convinced I agree with him, but I decided there wasn't too much to lose by playing until I lost a game, which I figured would be soon enough. But I won 10 in a row, so I wound up spending more of the day playing poker than I meant to.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/last-weekend.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107698014905401871

 
NYC THEATER REVIEW: CARNIVAL KNOWLEDGE * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars out of 4).
External link: http://www.carnivalknowledge.com/

This delightful show classes up the old-time carnival side show with sophisticated banter and a behind the scenes look at how a lot of the tricks are done. It reminds me a lot of the first time I ever saw Penn and Teller, which I still think was one of the best shows I ever saw. This was not as good as that show was, but it's very good, and it's definitely in the same spirit. It is very suitable for children, but there are a lot of risque jokes, deliberately designed to go over their heads.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/nyc-theater-review-carnival-knowledge.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107698004383412778

 
MOVIE REVIEW: 50 FIRST DATES * * (2 stars out of 4).
External link: http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/50firstdates/

There are some funny moments in Adam Sandler's and Drew Barrymore's latest hit, but it relies too much on the cuteness of children and animals, which never really works for me on the big screen. Also, I don't really think I'm telling you anything you don't already know, when I say that it relies a little too heavily on the too-tried-and-true Adam Sandler formula: 1) there's a funny, clever, creative premise that you've completely explored by the end of the coming attraction; 2) boy gets girl; 3) boy loses girl; 4) boy gets girl. It's getting a little too predictable.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/movie-review-50-first-dates-2-stars.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107697935271283810



Thursday, February 12, 2004

 
NYC RESTAURANT REVIEWS.
External link: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2003_01_01_archive.html#90261619

I've been pretty lax in reviewing restaurants, so I thought I'd give a quick run through, all at once, of all the restaurants on my American Express year-end summary from last year that I remember eating at and are still in business. All stars are out of a possible four stars.

MANGIA * * 1/2 (2 and a half stars)
This self-serve has a nice atmosphere, but is overpriced. You'll be a lot happier at the new Whole Foods Market in the new Time Warner building.

NONG * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
Delicious, elegant modern pan-Asian cuisine.

CRAFT * * 1/2 (2 and a half stars).
The food was hearty but the flavors were very overwhelming and unsubtle. Overpriced.

AUREOLE * * * (3 stars).
Good, but a little overpriced.

DIM SUM GO GO * * 1/2 (2 and a half stars).
Too greasy! Very inexpensive.

WOLF'S DELI * * * (3 stars).
In any other town, it'd be a great deli. It's nice when you want something a little smaller and lighter than you get at those great New York Delis that overstuff every sandwich.

HOOTERS 1/2 (half a star).
I get dragged here a lot, because I live very close to it and it's good for the Atkins diet. I really think they believe that having waitresses in skimpy costumes means that they don't need to put any effort into the food quality.

EAST 55 * (one star).
I live right across the street from this sushi joint, and I love sushi, so I wind up here a lot, but I really don't like it. It's one of my least favorite sushi restaurants in New York. It always smells a little fishy to me, though I'm very sensitive to that.

PICK A BAGEL ON 57TH * * * (3 stars).
Great for a quick bite. The sushi here is surprisingly good, especially for the price.

MARLOWE * * * 1/2 (3 stars).
Probably my favorite Italian on Restaurant Row (46th between 8th and 9th). They have especially good pasta, and a great dinner special.

B.SMITH * * 1/2 (2 and a half stars).
It's okay, but its one of my least favorite restaurants on Restaurant Row, which has a lot of really great restaurants.

LINDY'S * 1/2 (1 and a half stars).
Passable, but I just don't know how this very mediocre restaurant has lasted so many years.

VYNL * * (2 stars).
Okay, but a little too oily for my taste.

HOWARD JOHNSON IN TIMES SQUARE * * * (3 stars).
The clam strips and the ice cream are as good as you remember. But I come for the atmosphere. They have a piece of real estate that is easily worth twenty million dollars, and they can't possibly have renovated that place once since 1970. It's the single most authentic thing in Times Square.

JOHN'S SHANGHAI * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
The soup dumplings are fantastic, and there are a lot of bargains on the menu.

SUSHIYA * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
The sushi here is always delicate and sweet and excellent. The menu is a little pricey, but the maki combo specials are a bargain. In a city where it's a sin to ever go to the same restaurant twice, I go to Sushiya all the time.

TOPAZ THAI * * 1/2 (2 and a half stars).
It's okay, but it seems very westernized and inauthentic.

VINCENT'S * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
This hundred-year-old Little Italy favorite on Hester and Mott has amazingly good red sauce and great meatballs and excellent pasta.

FERRARA * * * * (4 stars).
This Little Italy bakery/cafe has amazing Italian desserts.

JOSIES * (1 star).
This health food restaurant has a lot of vegetarian choices, but everything is just so bland that it is a chore to eat it.

BROOKLYN DINER * 1/2 (1 and a half stars).
This very average diner on 57th in Manhattan is terribly overpriced.

COFFEE SHOP * * * (3 stars).
This hip bar/restaurant has very good food and is open very late.

JOHN'S PIZZERIA * * * * (4 stars).
A real contender for best pizza in New York, it's probably my second favorite after Lombardi's. Note to Atkins dieters: they bake the cheese right onto the bread and put the sauce on top, so this place is not for you if you like to just eat the cheese and toppings.

RUE 57 * * * (3 stars).
This elegant, casual French bistro has very good steak tar tar, and a great Sunday brunch.

ANGELO COAL OVEN PIZZA * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
Way better than the best pizza in your town, but probably just misses my top ten in New York.

BEN'S KOSHER DELI * * * (3 stars).
Way better than the best deli in your town, but probably barely makes my top ten in New York.

THE EMERALD PLANET * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
I really like this health-conscious fast-food wrap place.

VICTORS CAFE 52ND ST * * (2 stars).
Okay, but growing up in South Florida has given me very high standards for Cuban food, and this does not make the cut.

RUSSIAN SAMOVAR * * * (3 stars).
Hearty food yet delicately flavored.

WILD RED ONION * * * (3 stars).
This sushi and Thai combo has something for everyone, and a lot of creative sushi choices.

MAISON * * * (3 stars).
A great place to eat outside when the weather is nice. Good French food at high, but reasonable prices.

ROUTE 66 CAFE * * 1/2 (2 and a half stars).
My friends all love this southwestern style restaurant, but I find it quite ordinary.

CINEMA CAFE * * * (3 stars).
A dopey, half-attempted gimmick, but pretty good food.

AQUAVIT * * 1/2 (2 and a half stars).
Very fancy schmancy, but the food is not particularly special. Overpriced.

DALLAS BBQ * * * (3 stars).
Good food at a good price.

BEN ASH (no stars).
I don't know how this horrible restaurant stays in business. I'd heard nothing but outrageously bad things about this place from my friends and family, and I thought it couldn't possibly be that bad, but it was.

SHELLY'S * * * (3 stars).
Very good seafood, but falls well short of greatness.

ELLEN'S STARDUST DINER * * (2 stars).
I don't really like the gimmick of having the wait staff perform karaoke, and the food is otherwise just average and overpriced.

ART CAFE * * (2 stars).
A very ordinary diner with pretentious style.

ETATS-UNIS * * * * (4 stars).
Exquisite, delicate, wonderful food.

WONDEE SIAM * * * (3 stars).
One of the better Thai restaurants in New York.

SARABETHS AT THE WHITNEY * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
They have an excellent Sunday brunch, if you don't mind the crowds.

JING FONG * * * * (4 stars).
My favorite Dim Sum in Chinatown. Plus, it's crazy cheap.

HEARTLAND BREWERY * * * (3 stars).
Good hearty food. Enough so that I definitely think of this as a restaurant first, and as a bar as a distant second.

APPLE JACK DINER * * * (3 stars).
A better than average diner.

RUBY FOO'S TIME SQUARE * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
Very good, but definitely very overpriced.

JACKSON HOLE * * * * (4 stars).
A definite contender for best burger in New York, but don't let that keep you from exploring the rest of their excellent menu.

GALLAGHER'S * * 1/2 (2 and a half stars).
You know, I just don't like steakhouses very much. You shouldn't listen to my opinion about any of them in particular at all.

ROSIE O'GRADY'S * * * (3 stars).
What I like about this steakhouse is that they have some pretty good things on the menu besides steak for people like me, who don't really like steak.

RIO GRANDE * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
This new restaurant is definitely my favorite Mexican in Manhattan, and that's only partly because there aren't a lot of very good Mexican restaurants here.

PAD THAI * * * (3 stars).
Probably my favorite Thai in Manhattan, but I just can't find great Thai food here.

BLUE CHILI * * * (3 stars).
This new Sushi restaurant is just okay and overpriced.

CAFE MOZART * * * 1/2 (3 and half stars).
Wonderful desserts.

PASTABREAK * (1 star).
This Times Square fast food pasta restaurant would have to improve considerably in order to be mediocre.

DANNY'S GRAND SEA PALACE * * * (3 stars).
"Where Bangkok meets Broadway," this combination Thai and New York steakhouse is pretty good, at least on the Thai side of the menu.

NOCHE * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
Good food, good service, and an elegant, energetic atmosphere.

COPELAND'S * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars).
This Harlem soul food restaurant is excellent. The fast food outlet next door has food that is just as good at absurdly low prices.

CHAT-N-CHEW * * 1/2 (2 and a half stars).
I know a lot of people who really love this place, but I find it rather average.

ACME BAR * * * (3 stars).
Great Cajun food at low prices.

EL CID TAPAS * * * (3 stars).
Good, reasonably priced tapas.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/nyc-restaurant-reviews.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107661275699605125

 
THE END OF THE BEGINNING.
External link: http://www.aetv.com/tv/shows/airline/

Based on the premise that "Every passenger has a story," the new reality series "Airline" premiered in January on A&E under the tagline, "We all have our baggage." It escaped my notice until I saw a poster for it tonight, walking past a bus stop. I will always remember that as the moment I first realized that there are finally just too many television shows and too many channels.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/end-of-beginning.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107657306673504821



Wednesday, February 11, 2004

 
MY FAMILY VISITS.
External link: http://www.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/

As I said in my last entry, after arriving on Sunday, my family and I went to my cousin's house.

Monday, we had lunch at the new Time Warner building. In the evening, we saw Gypsy on Broadway, and ate at the Stage Delicatessen.

On Tuesday, we had lunch at Cosi, which they had never been to before and really seemed to like. Then, we saw a taping of the Late Show with David Letterman, and had dinner at the Carnegie Deli, my favorite restaurant in the world.

Wednesday, we had lunch at brasserie 360, and walked around the East side, and then they left for Florida.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/my-family-visits.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107654999409731677

 
LAST WEEKEND.
External link: http://www.littleshopofhorrors.com/index.php

On Thursday night, I went to Mod again with Steve K. and Evan.

On Friday, I had lunch with Jin K. at Blue Fin. It was very good, but would have been overpriced, were it not for the great deal we got because it was the last day of restaurant week. Then, we went to check out the new Time Warner headquarters at Columbus Circle. Then, we saw Little Shop of Horrors together on Broadway. Then we had Thai food for dinner at Yum Yum Bangkok. What it lacked in atmosphere it made up for in great food and good service.

Saturday, I went with Jessica D. to see "Truth or Dare," a comedy stage show in the East Village, but we left early when it turned out the performer she came primarily to see would not be there that night.

Sunday, my family arrived to visit from Florida. We went to my cousin Barry's house in New Jersey for dinner with him and his family.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/last-weekend_11.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107654903653401290

 
THEATER REVIEW: LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS * * * (3 stars out of 4).
External link: http://www.littleshopofhorrors.com/index.php

This fun musical starts out very similar to the excellent 1986 movie of the same name. That movie, in turn was based on an off-Broadway musical of the same name, with which I am not familiar. Anyway, there are also a lot of nice songs in the Broadway version which are not in the movie. Also, the Broadway version is, at the same time, both darker and more festive and whimsical than the movie. I recommend it. And there are still great seats at TKTS.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/theater-review-little-shop-of-horrors.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107654827264902863



Friday, February 06, 2004

 
JFK
External link:

Presidential candidate John Forbes Kerry's initials are JFK. And he's a Senator from Massachussettes. And he's Catholic.

Interesting.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/jfk.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107608302725062355



Thursday, February 05, 2004

 
DON'T LIKE SPAM?
External link: mailto:piracy@microsoft.com

I've got really mixed feelings about Microsoft and about software piracy in general. But I definitely don't like spam. So whenever I get a spam advertising Microsoft software that I believe may be pirated (e.g., because it is discounted, say, 80%, or because it is sold without a box or manual), I always report it to Microsoft piracy enforcement at piracy@microsoft.com. I'm sure it doesn't make a huge dent in all the spam that gets sent out, but every little bit helps.

And remember: never, ever buy anything from a spammer! The people who buy things from spammers is what pays for all the spam to get sent to everybody. If everyone stops buying from spammers, spam will go away.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/dont-like-spam.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107600460300780756



Tuesday, February 03, 2004

 
IT WAS TWENTY YEARS AGO TODAY, TWENTY YEARS AGO TODAY.
External link: http://www.beatles.com/

This Saturday, February 7, 2004, is the fortieth anniversary of the Beatles first visit to America, and plenty of people are marking the occasion by mentioning that on that day you can say "it was forty years ago today," after the line "it was twenty years ago today," in the song Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.

But it seems to me that the better way to celebrate that lyric is to point out that, as of February 7th, it was twenty years ago today, twenty years ago today.

View my provocative insights into the Beatle's greatness here.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/it-was-twenty-years-ago-today-twenty.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107584280965872288



Monday, February 02, 2004

 
SPAMMERS CANNED.
External link: http://www.wired.com/news/ebiz/0,1272,62124,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_5

Wired Magazine reports that the people behind the Nigerian spam swindle were caught in a daring raid of 52 people in 23 apartments in the Netherlands.

Recall that about a year ago, The Official Record reported that the Nigerian spam scam had resulted in the assassination of the Nigerian consul to the Czech Republic.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/spammers-canned.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107574854266328268

 
LAST WEEKEND.
External link: http://www.sonywondertechlab.com/

On Thursday, I went to Mod on the Upper West Side, with Steve K., Heidi H., Maria, and Addi. It's a really fun bar with a late-60s / early-70s theme, and with great drink specials.

Friday, I spent the day with Jin K. We had lunch at a fancy Chinese restaurant that had a restaurant week special. Then we went to Sony Wonder Technology Lab, a fun tourist spot. And then we saw Anna in the Tropics, on Broadway and had a fast food dinner. And I bought a hat!

Saturday, I had lunch with Paul M. and Jessica D. at the new sushi place around the corner that I forget the name of. Then Paul and I went shopping in Chinatown, and then we went to dinner in Little Italy with Mai X. and Manny F. Then Manny and I went to a party at a bar in midtown.

Sunday, I really planned to do anything except watch the game, but I found myself sucked into it a little on TV, less because of the game itself (and the fact that I lived in North Carolina for four years), and more because it just looks so amazingly good on high definition television.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/last-weekend_02.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107574760592835713

 
THEATER REVIEW: ANNA IN THE TROPICS * * 1/2 (two and a half stars out of 4).
External link: http://www.playbill.com/events/event_detail/3239.html

This play, about a "lector" that factory workers hire to read to them while they toil, was clever and well-written. But, with the notable exception of Jimmy Smits as the lector, I found the acting so distractingly bad that it took me out of the story. I would say that I can't really tell the difference between a great actor and a mediocre actor. But many of the people on stage were just belting out their lines, giving the same cadence to every word, as though they didn't understand what the words meant, and it made it hard to believe that these things were really happening to these people.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/theater-review-anna-in-tropics-12-two.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107574695888239931



Sunday, February 01, 2004

 
MOVIE REVIEW: HEAVEN CAN WAIT (1978) 1/2 (1/2 a star out of 4).
External link: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077663/

This cliched, predictable modern day fairytail about an athlete wrongly taken to heaven before his time, and allowed to return in the body of a recently deceased millionaire has the quality dialogue you'd expect from a porno movie. Not that it's profane-- just that it's mind-numbingly dull and unbelievable. You know I've never seen a Warren Beatty movie that I've liked even a little bit. I just hated Dick Tracy and Bugsy and now this one.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/movie-review-heaven-can-wait-1978-12.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107567242940098087

 
MOVIE REVIEW: WAYDOWNTOWN (2000) * * * 1/2 (3 and a half stars out of 4).
External link: http://www.lot47.com/waydowntown/

This trippy, surreal black comedy was very funny and very dark, and kind of sexy. It involves a group of office mates who live and work downtown, and realize that they can work, live, eat, and shop without ever going outside, so they make a bet to see who can stay indoors the longest. Along the way is a lot of sardonic commentary on life at the turn of the new century.


link to this item: http://www.creamy.com/blog/2004/02/movie-review-waydowntown-2000-12-3-and.html


Check for older comments: Archived comments on item #107567202161415317





This page is powered by Blogger.